How Iran decided to bomb US bases and how Trump avoided an all-out war

By Elijah J. Magnier: @ejmalrai

On the third of January, after midnight, news about the assassination of Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani, Brigadier General Hussein pour Jaafari, Colonel Shahroud Muzaffari Nia, Major Hadi Tameri and Captain Wahid Zamaniam reached the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad. Officers at the embassy were in contact with the convoy, and suddenly the communication was interrupted. Sardar Soleimani had diplomatic immunity and had been officially asked by the Iraqi government to help in defeating ISIS. Moreover, the convoy was attacked just before an Iraqi checkpoint that knew the Iraqi commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandes was in convoy along with his protection team. The news was communicated to Tehran and from it to the house of the Iranian leader of the revolution Sayyed Ali Khamenei.

“We belong to Allah and to Him we shall return”. These verses of the Qoran a believer would pronounce when the death of someone he knows is announced, whether close to him or not. It is a reminder that all humans are mortal. That was the first reaction of Sayyed Khamenei when the news reached him of the death of “a son”. That was Sardar Soleimani’s closeness to Sayyed Khamenei. Soleimani earned the title of “living martyr” due to the many occasions his life was in danger while fighting ISIS and al-Qaeda in Iraq and Syria.

Soleimani left Beirut and slept in Syria on the first of January, not far from Damascus airport. On every trip to Syria, he used to hold a meeting with all commanders, after morning prayers and just before the sun rises, for a maximum of two hours. That day he kept all commanders for lunch and allowed them to leave just before sunset. He didn’t stop talking, leaving his instructions for his team of commanders in the Levant. Captain Wahid Zamaniam used to be his inseparable companion. The Major General was greeted by Iranian and Iraqi officers at Baghdad airport when arriving, where a US drone assassinated them.

According to a well-informed source within the “Axis of the Resistance”, when he learned about the assassination, Sayyed Khamenei called for a meeting of his commanders in the first hours following the murder and instructed: “prepare yourself for a strong reply. We shall announce our direct responsibility, so our enemy knows we are challenging it face to face and not in the cowardly way the US killed Soleimani and his companions. Hit the US army hard to break their arrogance in the same theatre they have executed this vile assassination”.

Many scenarios were laid down in front of Sayyed Khamenei. The first choice was Ayn al-Assad, the most significant and most substantial airbase in Iraq, where President Trump landed in what he considered the safest location in Iraq. Iran knows every single detail about the base. Its drones and intelligence were good enough to identify the contents of every hangar and construction.

A plan for a second hit was also prepared against a US base outside Iraq across the Persian Gulf, more powerful and painful than the first objective, in case the US responded to the Ayn al-Assad hit. 

A third hit was also organised, much more powerful and destructive than the first two against the most significant US base in the Middle East. This hit aimed to cause many casualties, many more than the US other possible retaliation.

Three plans, three scenarios, all planned to be executed one after the other for three consecutive hits. Sayyed Ali Khamenei approved all these responses so there would be no need for his commanders to ask for his blessing. After that, Sayyed Khamenei instructed his commanders to return to him for further instructions and to declare a general mobilisation of the country where an all-out war would be announced against the US if there were military responses to all the Iranian hits. In this last scenario, Sayyed Khamenei ordered a plan where hundreds of missiles would have been launched simultaneously against all US military bases in the countries surrounding Iran, in the Levant and beyond. All Iran allies in the Middle East would have been involved, and US allies would be directly hit. But this ultimate decision would require the last evaluation by Sayyed Khamenei.

That was a foreseeable scenario that the US President – with his decision to stand down, notwithstanding the human casualties and destruction inflicted on Ayn al-Assad military base – managed to avoid.

“Iran didn’t use any missiles in its silos to hit US targets at Ayn al-Assad. On the contrary, missiles were deployed overtly and prepared for launching two days before under the eyes of US satellites. Messages were flocking to Iran from diplomats asking to refrain from retaliating or at least to soften the response. All requests were turned down. Iran avoided surprising the US; had Iran wanted to surprise the US, missiles would have been launched from its silos with no warning. It was a direct challenge to US hegemony. Moreover, Iran informed the US that the hit was coming, further challenging President Trump and his military apparatus in the Middle East by showing that Iran is not afraid of the consequences”, said the source.

Iran sent its drones over Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and other nearby countries in daylight over US bases. It was a signal that Tehran was prepared for war and an indication of some of the Iranian bank of objectives. The Iranian leadership was ready to go to the point of a no-return if necessary.

No one in Iran accepts to give up the missile programme that has become the pride of the Iranian people and its armed forces. When the US bombed hundreds of Russian contractors in Syria, Deir-Ezzour, who were crossing the Euphrates river to chase ISIS remnants, Russia decided not to respond. No country or army in the Middle East ever challenged the US, notably when the US deployed tens of thousands of troops and effective equipment in the Middle East. Only Iran has directly challenged US hegemony and military power.

The “Axis of Resistance” confirmed the balance of fear and imposed a deterrence policy on the US in the Middle East. Iran overtly challenged the US and declared its responsibility with no fear of the consequences. So far, the US has confirmed at least 64 casualties suffered; some time ago Iran announced that “US casualties were not less than 80.”

President Trump thought he was living a historical moment in his life where he could do anything he wants with no fear of consequences. He believed no country in the world would dare to challenge him. He also advised that Iraq was divided, that no government could contest violation of its sovereignty, and that Iran is no longer tolerated in Mesopotamia. He was most likely informed that the burning of two Iranian consulates was enough to kick Iran out of Iraq. Perhaps he imagined that assassinating Sardar Qassem Soleimani would go unpunished, and he bragged about killing “two for the price of one.” He and his warmonger team also wrongly believed – and I guess still find – that his “maximum pressure” and harsh sanctions would bring Iran onto its knees begging him for mercy. He said he would be waiting by the phone for Iran to call, proving his ignorance of Iran, its mentality, culture, patience, harshness and pride. 

The magic turned against the magician and Trump gave Iran a massive gift by allowing it to bomb his army and challenge him face to face. Trump was afraid to announce the number of casualties in the first week. The Pentagon is now releasing a part of the reality every week. The US, not Iran, has shown fear.

“All US military bases have become a threat to the hosting countries in the Middle East. These bases no longer serve to protect these countries but have become perfect targets for Iran in case of war. They provide an overwhelming list of targets for Iran. No place will be safe for US forces in the Middle East if red-lines are crossed, as happened with the assassination of Sardar Soleimani,” said the source.

This article is translated free to many languages by volunteers so readers can enjoy the content. It shall not be masked by Paywall. I’d like to thank my followers and readers for the confidence and support. If you like it, please don’t feel embarrassed to contribute and help fund it for as little as 1 Euro. Your contribution, however small, will help ensure its continuity. Thank you.

Copyright ©  2020

43 thoughts on “How Iran decided to bomb US bases and how Trump avoided an all-out war

  1. Thank you. The problem with Allawi is his personality. he is not strong enough to fight and stand agianst heavy pressure coming from the street, the US, the Iraqi political parties and the reforms needed to boost Iraq economy. A huge challenge to any PM really. I fear Iraq is not going toward a stability any soon.

  2. Mr. Magnier, I wonder if my comments are going through, and if you’re receiving my emails. Please let me know. Thanks.

    Lone Wolf

    PS: I just sent you an email asking the same questions. Based on my experience with your response time to my emails, I assume either they didn’t get to you, or you haven’t had time to see them. Just a reminder as they might get lost among the pile of emails you receive, or they are going to your Spam box. Thanks.

  3. Thanks for your input.

    Sadr forces appear to be under attack, two of his top commanders were killed in less than 24 hours.

    Regardless of the intentions, whether the killings were carried out to exacerbate divisions among Iraqi groups, or to decimate Sadrist forces, the blows are concerning given Iraq is a Swiss cheese for all Western intel alphabet soup, same assassins of Shahid Sardar Soleimani, whose elimination is a plus for these groups, his vacuum for them to exploit.

    Hopefully the new Allawi will bring some semblance of stability to Iraq, given Ayatollah Ali Sistani is in poor health, a towering force in defense of the Iraqi people from foreign and domestic enemies alike.

    Welcome back, we’ve been feeling the presence of your absence.

    Lone Wolf

  4. I know Mohamad Allawi in person. He is not like his cousin. However, he doesn’t have a very strong personality and I hope he manages to form his government and abide by the parliament’s decision to protect Iraq’s sovereignty. Allawi was Moqtada al-Sadr Candidate. That was the best way to persue the US withdrawal from Iraq. If Moqtada is happy, the PM will stay in power with little problems.

  5. Hi, would you like a translation to portuguese? I’ve done already, for some friends.

  6. Mr. Magnier,

    Yet another Allawi is to become PM in Iraq, I wonder if you could illustrate us in a future article about the Allawi family hold onto the corridors of power in Iraq, and what can we expect from the designated PM. Also, after the assassination of Shahid Sardar Soleimani, has Iran “king-making” abilities in Iraq diminished, or they still play a role in the nomination of a PM? I, as many others, would appreciate your insights. Gratefully,

    Lone Wolf

  7. It depends on how serious the US is in its intention to leave and preparation in the next 3 months. If the US continues to refuse to send a delegation to coordinate its withdrawal – as it is the case today – and ignore the Iraqi government’s request, US forces will be considered an occupation force. No US soldier or officer would dare to train any Iraqi forces or offer assistance to the military industry (Iraq bought plenty of weapons from the US including jets). This would limit the US presence into their bases and get bombed which doesn’t make a lot of sense to stay.

  8. We (royal we), cannot thank you enough for keeping us abreast in such detail of vital events between the not-so new axis of the contradiction, as everyone of your words carry the force of truth.

    Back in December 28, 2019, the “Head of Center for Contemporary Iran Studies in Russia Recep Safarov” declared “Iran has turned out to be a superpower” on occasion of the joint military drills between Iran, Russia, and China in the Indian Ocean. ( The statement was made to Iranian news agency, IRNA, and was mostly ignored by the MSM, but only a few days later Iran showed a stupefied world its superpower abilities by bombing two US bases in Mesopotamia. Iran only gradually evolved into becoming a pole of the contradiction, soon after Viet Nam soundly defeated the US in 1975, marking the departure of the US from Southeast Asia.

    Enter Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979, and the victory of the Iranian revolution moved the coordinates of the contradiction from Southeast to Southwest Asia. The rise of Iran as a superpower has been powered up by the other pole of the contradiction, the United States, with its obsessive-compulsive goals of getting Iran back as a subject of the empire. Iran’s resistance and expansion of its geopolitical strategic depth through regional and international alliances, and the creation of the Axis of Resistance, has only added to the “maximum pressure” the US has exerted over Iran for decades now, in order to turn it into a “normal” country.

    Iran’s importance as a pole in the new axis of the contradiction Empire/Third World, is mainly due to two factors: its vast oil and gas reserves, and its refusal to accept Israel as a “normal” country. In fact, Iran correctly defines Israel as an aberration, a bastard child of the West, a corrupting cancer in the body of the Arab and Muslim countries in the Levant and beyond. Israel and the US “Israel firsters,” Israel’s fifth column in the US, the infamous Neo-cons and the Jewish mafia, Adelson, Kushner, et al, found in Trump a useful idiot/political whore, willing to compromise US foreign policy to the max to realize Israel’s dream of a “lebensraum,” and further the dispossession of the Palestinian people.

    Trump’s “Deal of the Century” reminds us of the comedy film of the same name, capo Mafiosi Kushner probably got the “inspiration” after watching the movie (, with Trump as a wheeler-dealer, a merchant of death, giving Israel the Golan, Jerusalem and the Jordan Valley, gaining Brownie points with the evangelicals who see him as a modern-day king David, even worse, king Cyrus. US die-hard evangelicals believe Trump is applying “Biblical law,” which supersedes international law by an order of magnitude (sic!), just that if anyone believes Trump can “give” anything to Israel in a brazen rape of the rules of international law and Westphalian sovereignty, I have a bridge on sale for you, from Alaska to Russia.

    On a more serious note, Major General Mohammad Baqeri, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, made a statement addressing defense ministers and army chiefs of the Muslim world, in which he said “The Muslim world’s first priority is liberation of the Palestinian nation and liberation of the Noble Quds, which is Muslims’ First Qibla (the direction towards which Muslims stand when saying their prayers),” ( More serious challenge to the so-called “deal” couldn’t have been made, publicly

    All roads lead to Jerusalem.

    Lone Wolf

  9. If the three-month grace period for the US to leave Iraq expires and the US hasn’t left, what happens then?

  10. It is about time for someone to stand up to the USA and its allies the Israelis thieves , Saudi bastards and the rest of the gulf states .
    God bless Iran , Syria , Lebanon and Hezbollah.

  11. Many people dont like the Iranian regime because it is authoritarian and religious.. By the same token I like them because of exactly that.. They can not be corrupted and bribed so easily as we see the corruption all over the place now. Going so far as to include children in their games because they have power and can get away with it. Where ever the US goes, morality and ethics just disappear from the culture. Because money can buy anything.

  12. Mr Magnier, Ive been reading and enjoying your insights for some time.
    I think your perspective is invaluable and, for me, has almost completely replaced a former reliance on the msm for analysis and information. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.