La fermeture d’al-Sheeb : comment une concession irakienne à Washington pourrait servir les intérêts de l’Iran

Posted on by Elijah J Magnier
Closed Al-Sheeb border crossing sign, gate, trucks, and two guards
A closed Al-Sheeb border crossing stands beneath a bilingual warning sign as trucks wait beyond the gate.

Par Elijah J. Magnier

L’invasion américaine de 2003 a élargi les possibilités pour l’Iran de renforcer son influence en Irak. Téhéran y a noué de puissantes relations politiques et des liens économiques devenus d’autant plus précieux sous les sanctions américaines. Les gouvernements irakiens successifs ont ainsi dû gérer leurs relations avec les deux puissances.

Les Premiers ministres irakiens évoluent dans un système politique où des partis influents peuvent limiter les décisions affectant Téhéran. La relation de Bagdad avec Washington ne détermine donc pas automatiquement celle qu’elle entretient avec l’Iran. Chaque gouvernement doit composer avec des pressions concurrentes tout en préservant sa position intérieure.

Dans ce contexte, fermer al-Sheeb peut satisfaire une demande américaine sans constituer une défaite stratégique iranienne. Téhéran peut s’accommoder de mesures renforçant la confiance de Washington envers Bagdad. L’Irak reste la partie la plus exposée, pris entre pressions extérieures, dépendance économique et contraintes politiques intérieures.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Subscribe

Published by Elijah J Magnier

Elijah J. Magnier is a veteran war correspondent and analyst specialising in military affairs, intelligence, strategic affairs and political risk. He has spent nearly four decades living and reporting inside countries at war, often from the front lines, while developing long-standing access to political leaders, military and intelligence officials, diplomats, armed non-state actors and communities directly affected by conflict. His field experience includes the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the Iran–Iraq War, the Lebanese Civil War, the 1991 Gulf War, the wars in the former Yugoslavia, conflict in Sudan, the war in Afghanistan and Yemen, the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq and its aftermath, the 2006 Lebanon War, and the wars in Libya and Syria. He has lived for extended periods in Lebanon, Bosnia, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria, allowing him to follow conflicts, political transformations and regional networks beyond the limitations of short-term war reporting. His work focuses on warfare and deterrence, terrorism and counterterrorism, intelligence, political violence, armed non-state actors, regional security and the relationship between military power and political outcomes. He has also served as an adviser to the European Parliament’s Rapporteur on Iraq and Lebanon. Magnier holds a PhD in Policing and Criminal Justice from Liverpool John Moores University and an MSc in Counterterrorism Studies from the University of London. He has undertaken advanced studies in terrorism—including terrorist ideologies, financing and counterterrorism—at the University of St Andrews; terrorism and counterterrorism at Leiden University; and negotiation, including international and cross-cultural negotiation, at ESSEC Business School in Paris. His work combines sustained field access with academic analysis of war, sovereignty, deterrence and political violence.