
By Elijah J. Magnier –
The negotiations between Iran and the United States are no longer simply about ending the war. They are about shaping what comes after it: the political balance, the economic settlement and the strategic rules that will define the next phase.This is why the talks remain so difficult. Both sides are exploring diplomacy through intermediaries, but both continue to speak the language of pressure. Washington wants to end the conflict without appearing defeated. Tehran wants to survive the war without surrendering the leverage that allowed it to withstand the most intense US-Israeli military campaign in its modern history.The core problem is simple: the United States is negotiating as if Iran lost the war, while Iran is negotiating as a state that absorbed the assault, survived it and imposed costs in return. The Iranian leadership cannot return to its people with only a ceasefire, the same sanctions as before and the enormous burden of reconstruction. That would allow Washington and Tel Aviv to achieve after the war what they failed to impose during it.
Subscribe to get access
Read more of this content when you subscribe today.
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
You must be logged in to post a comment.