Russian-Kurdish negotiations in Moscow: Turkey has defined its options and Washington is trying to gain time

By Elijah J. Magnier: @ejmalrai

Secret negotiations are ongoing in Moscow and Damascus between representatives of the Syrian Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and Russian officials concerning the fate of Kurdish militants in Syria. The Kurdish delegation is hoping that Russia – and not the US – will adopt the role of guarantor of their safety and is trying to gain a few more concessions to reduce their losses when the Syrian government forces regains complete control of al-Hasaka province in Northeast Syria. 

This will happen only when the US establishment finally decides to pull out its last soldier and ends its occupation of al-Hasaka. PKK representatives have offered a “road map” meant to include promises of protection, the sharing of wealth and the security of borders with Turkey. The US is trying to offload responsibility for the Kurds’s safety onto Turkey, while Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has rebuffed US requests to offer this kind of protection to his PKK enemies in Syria. Erdogan is evidently putting his strategic-commercial alliance with Russia ahead of his turbulent NATO alliance with the USA.

The Kurdish militant group known variously asYPG, the People’s Protection Units, and the PKK (Syrian branch) is convinced the time has come to climb off the US’s shoulders onto Russian ones since Washington has decided to drop them off the Turkish cliff. Nevertheless, Syrian officials are also determined to give no concessions to the Kurds notwithstanding the Russian mediation with Damascus.

The militants Kurds of Syria have only now begun to realise how vulnerable their position is: they are weaker than ever due to the US decision to withdraw and the naïve requests – formulated by both US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton – for Ankara to offer protection to its sworn enemies. It looks like officials in Washington have no plans for the Kurds. Indeed, while the US is expressing concern about the Kurds it would like somebody else to look after them. The US shows little appreciation for the sacrifices made by YPG militants – who have acted as human shields for the American forces during their time in al-Hasaka province in northeast Syria – and the thousands of casualties they have suffered. Even worse, Trump laughed about Kurdish fighting capabilities by sarcastically saying the Kurds “fight better when we fight with them and when we send 30 F-18’s in front of them”.

So the Kurds have finally learned their lesson and would like to be part of the Syrian state. They have seen the world watching – impotently, unwilling to intervene against Turkey – the exodus of hundreds of thousands from Afrin. They have heard Trump’s decision to abandon them. With his departure their dream of Rojava, the long awaited Kurdish state, evaporates. 

For Damascus, had Turkey occupied the north of Syria, it would have been possible to exert diplomatic and international leverage on Ankara to force its departure from Syrian territory. At the same time, it would have been almost impossible for the Syrian government to force an early departure of the US forces had these established themselves in Afrin or al-Hasaka, offering a platform for Israel to use the Levant by benefitting from American infrastructure in the area.

President Bashar al-Assad has said to the Russian negotiators that “Syria belongs to all Syrians and the Kurds are part of Syria. Therefore they should not enjoy more or fewer rights than any other citizens. They will be given identities but are not entitled to any special concessions”. Moreover, Assad has agreed not to consider the Kurds as traitors despite their protection of the US occupation forces. He has insisted that the only force operating on the national territory be the one belonging to the Syrian army under the control of the central government.

The Kurds welcomed the Syrian army in the area still under their control. Turkey has accepted to keep its forces and those of its Syrian proxies away from Manbij as long as the Kurdish militants are disarmed. Russia proposed and obtained the withdrawal of the Kurdish forces, re-establishing its observation posts, patrolling west of Manbij. Erdogan still hopes to reach a deal over North Syria during his forthcoming meeting with President Putin, expected sometime in January. The presence of thousands of Syrian jihadists and armed proxies at the gates of Manbij is further weakening the Kurdish negotiation position. They have no other place to seek refuge but in Damascus.

President Erdogan has managed to keep a balance between his relationships with Moscow and Washington even if his choices in Syria seem already made. Russia offers a stable durable and equal economic and strategic partnership with Turkey whereas the US has no consistent friends at all, only common interests. Moreover, the US forces have armed the Kurdish militants, the enemies of Turkey, where Russia will agree to disarm them and put an end to their military power. Trump’s apparent willingness to revoke any deal (the Iranian nuclear agreement) or give up on his allies (the Kurds) is helping to push Turkey into Russia’s arms.

If the US agrees to donate the weapons it has equipped the Kurds with, this arsenal will happily end up in the Syrian army inventory. If not, the Kurds will be vulnerable to the 1500 remaining ISIS fighters on the Euphrates river, particularly if the US disarms the Kurds and pulls out before the arrival of the Syrian army. The forces of Damascus and their allies have eliminated tens of thousands of ISIS militants in various cities, villages and in the Syrian steppe, and this without the benefit of 30 US F-18’s. The end of ISIS control of Syrian territory will be a game-changer in the Levant even if its “hit and run” insurgency will not disappear so easily. The dream of establishing an “Islamic State” in the Levant and Mesopotamia is, like “Rojava”, an unachievable and abandoned objective.

The US says it will remain around the al-Tanf crossing between Iraq and Syria. The establishment’s excuse for this presence has been to stop the Tehran-Baghdad-Damascus-Beirut bridge. Iran has been supplying Syria with weapons for over seven years of intensive multi-front continuous war. It has supplied Hezbollah with weapons and finance from 1982 until now. The US presence may disturb a possible railway or land road between Iran and Lebanon but cannot disrupt the established supply of weapons. The cost of air or sea shipment is indeed higher but so too are the costs of a prolonged US presence at al-Tanf, in the middle of the Syrian-Iraqi desert. The US is trying to gain time in Syria: in fact it is just wasting it.

Proofread by: Maurice Brasher and C.B.

This article is translated for free to many languages by volunteers so readers can enjoy the content. It shall not be masked by Paywall. I’d like to thank my followers and readers for the confidence and the support. If you like it, please don’t feel embarrassed to contribute and help fund it for as little as 1 Euro. Your contribution, however small, will help ensure its continuity. Thank you.

6 thoughts on “Russian-Kurdish negotiations in Moscow: Turkey has defined its options and Washington is trying to gain time

  1. “…The US is trying to gain time in Syria: in fact it is just wasting it.”

    E. J. Magnier

    “…Some US leaders pretend to be insane, but I don’t believe it. They are, however, first-class idiots.”

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Imam Sayyed Ali Khamenei

    The current predicament of the Syrian Kurds is yet another example of leadership failure. Their historical drive to carve out a Kurdish state out of Syria, turned the Kurdish leadership into desperate political opportunists, allowing the US to use their people as cannon fodders. What for? Thousands of Syrian Kurds have been killed in their futile attempt to follow on the footsteps of their corrupt, inefficient leaders in Iraq, the Barzani mafia, who were the first to barter with the devil (read US/Israel), and are still trying to carve a piece of Iraq for their greedy leaders.

    The old commonplace that “history repeats itself,” is too simplistic to explain the equivocated path followed by the Syrian Kurds, when left without Marx’s addition, “first time as tragedy, second time as farce.” Their dreams of a “Rajava” equivalent to Iraq’s Kurdistan will never be, despite all their sacrifice and their traitorous alliances with the enemies of Syria. After the Syrian Kurd leadership sacrificed thousands of their youth, including their gorgeous women, who were forced into the fight after witnessing the plight of their Yazidi counterparts, they will be back to where they were before the CIA/Mossad/NATO-created “caliphate” reared its ugly head in Syria/Iraq.

    At least their so-called “alliance” with the US helped the Syrian Kurds to defend themselves against ISIS, avoiding the plight of the Yazidis, but one has to wonder what kind of historical memory their leadership has, that brought them to mortgage the future of their people as US allies, a country infamous for using people and ethnic groups to further their interests, then throw them under the bus when convenient. The rotten US elite has practiced the same immoral pattern ever since America’s colonial times with the Native American tribes, all the way to the Viet Nam war with the CIA-recruited “Montagnards” in Cambodia and Laos. It is clear the Syrian Kurd leadership lacked strategic vision, otherwise they would have gone to the Russians, who have historically supported their cause, instead of the US. Their strategy was greed.

    Assad is right to avoid making any special concessions to the Syrian Kurds, they don’t deserve them. The US has helped them create a parallel governing structure in areas under their control, with the intention of plundering Syria’s oil. Now that the US is leaving, sort of, important oil fields will go back to Syria’s legit government, and Assad has to reestablish administrative control over Kurdish-controlled territories. From a military point of view, the potential alliance of convenience between the SDF/SAA in order to face Turkey, can help convince Erdogan to negotiate via Russia a political package that will eventually disarm the Kurds, putting their US weapons in Syrian government hands.

    Turkey lost the initiative after the announced US withdrawal caused the Kurds to invite the SAA to Mambij, and Erdogan’s ambition to control the oil fields under SDF control will remain just that. Now Russian MP is patrolling Mambij surroundings, guaranteeing Turkey’s proxies will remain in the outskirts, their thirst for blood unquenched due to the new political developments. Russia, in the background, is moving all the pieces into place to make sure a peaceful resolution benefits all parties involved. Putin has tied up Erdogan in a strategic embrace with trade and military benefits which Turkey will find difficult to give up for a short term military adventure with uncertain gains. Putin is teaching Erdogan the basics of statesmanship, and though hardheaded, Erdogan is learning some, slowly but surely.

    Next: Idlib.

    Lone Wolf

  2. The Us has been arming the PKK for many years now, then what do you expect Turkey to do: Pray in Washington for more? Washington has only itself to blame. They lost almost all of their ‘friends’ in the region. Thanks to Bush, Clinton, Obama and now Trump.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.